Building with SIPs in NZ: 5 Pitfalls to Avoid

Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) are becoming more common in New Zealand, especially for high-performance and Passive House builds. They offer faster construction, warmer homes, and lower running costs. But like any system, there are traps that can cost time and money if not handled well.

Based on what we’ve seen locally, and what’s been documented internationally, here are five pitfalls to avoid:

sips nz

1. Pricing off the wrong set of plans

This is one of the biggest issues we see in New Zealand. Some clients try to get SIP pricing from sketches or concept drawings. Others spend heavily on full, council-ready plans before they know if the design is affordable. Both approaches can lead to wasted money and rework.

Better approach: Develop a good set of preliminary drawings. These give enough detail for accurate SIP costing, without the cost of full consent drawings. Once the budget is confirmed, you can move to working drawings with confidence.

2. Services not designed in

Electrical and plumbing need to be planned early with SIPs. Unlike timber framing, you can’t drill or cut as easily on site risking compromising the panels. Leaving services to the last minute can mean expensive workarounds.

Better approach: Agree on a services strategy during design — service cavities, pre-routed chases, or surface-mounted runs. This protects the panels and keeps the build on schedule.

3. Airtightness and moisture risk at junctions

SIPs are airtight by design, but only if the joints are detailed and sealed correctly. Poor sealing at roof junctions in particular can cause moisture issues through condensation and air leakage.

Better approach: Follow the supplier’s tested junction details and use the recommended sealing products. A careful install makes the difference between an average build and a high-performance one.

4. Site conditions overlooked

NZ sites vary hugely, from salty coastal sections to alpine valleys. SIPs perform well in all climates, but roof pitch, orientation, and exposure still need careful design.

Better approach: Consider sun angles, prevailing winds, and rainfall at the concept stage. This ensures you’re getting the full benefit of SIP performance in your location.

5. Using non-certified or generic details

Not all SIP systems on the market are suitably appraised or certified, and not all details are equal. Using generic timber-frame assumptions or non-tested details can cause problems with compliance, performance, or even insurance.

Better approach: Always base drawings on the supplier’s appraised or certified details. This avoids redesigns, council RFIs, and gives confidence that the system will perform as promised

 The takeaway: Most SIP pitfalls aren’t about the panels themselves — they’re about planning. With the right prelim drawings, clear service strategies, careful junction detailing, site-specific design, and certified details, you’ll save time and money and deliver a high-performance home that lasts.

Want to reach out about your project?
We’re free to discuss your build at any stage — from early sketches through to final plans. Contact us here.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Why Mechanical Ventilation Matters

As New Zealand builds more airtight, energy-efficient homes – especially with SIPs, CLT, and high-performance timber – managing indoor air becomes critical. Without controlled ventilation, heat and moisture build up, leading to condensation, discomfort, and even mould.

Read More
sip panel

Rethinking SIP + OSB Interiors in New Zealand

New Zealand usually hides SIP panels behind plasterboard, but overseas architects are showcasing OSB as a visible finish. This piece explains why exposing SIP skins can add warmth, cut time and cost, and open fresh design options for NZ homes.

Read More